In the first part of this two-part post about high-performance computing, I already addressed three commonly-held myths associated with HPC. Now I’ll address three myths that are related to particular concerns about HPC adoption.
Myth #4: “Without internal IT support, HPC cluster adoption is undoable” Continue reading
You’ve heard all the talk about simulation-based design. You’ve listened to colleagues— maybe even some of your competitors — wax on about how doing robust simulation studies early on in the design cycle leads to more and better product ideas while also optimizing use of materials. In fact, you’re sold on the need to embrace advanced analysis, but you just don’t see how it’s feasible given the perceived complexity and cost of the simulation software — not to mention, the high-powered workstation gear. Continue reading
Looking back at my notes from conversations with many engineers during our recent ANSYS Convergence Conferences, I must admit that I still came across some myths and misconceptions about high-performance computing (HPC) for engineering simulation. Let me share six really striking ones with you:
- HPC is available on supercomputers only
- HPC is only useful for CFD simulations
- I don’t need HPC – my job is running fast enough
- Without internal IT support, HPC cluster adoption is undoable
- Parallel scalability is all about the same, right?
- HPC software and hardware are relative expensive
Are you familiar with ANSYS ACT (Application Customization Templates)? ACT allows all sorts of great customization. You could use ACT to encapsulate APDL scripts, add new loads and boundary conditions, create custom results, or even integrate third party tools. For instance, Vanderplaats R&D just integrated their topology optimization product into ANSYS Mechancial via ACT.
The ACT Toolkit requires a license to develop extensions, but not to use extensions created by others or provided in our ACT library. Continue reading
As each week begins, I realize what a privilege it is to work with leading HPC technology providers like Intel, NVIDIA, Dell, HP, IBM and many others. Apart from the pleasant inter-social aspects of our weekly meetings, these collaborations enable us to provide simulation solutions optimized on the latest computing platforms. I strongly believe this is necessary because the computing landscape changes so quickly. Our customers want to take advantage of the latest HPC technologies and expand the scope of what they can accomplish with simulation.
One example of a strong partnership is NVIDIA. As a result of this partnership, ANSYS and NVIDIA have developed GPU-accelerated solvers and algorithms across our full range of multiphysics solutions. We were one of the first commercial engineering simulation providers to introduce structural mechanics support of GPU computing, and we released the first major commercial GPU-accelerated fluid dynamics solver of its kind with ANSYS 15.0. Continue reading
It is always my pleasure to meet with our customers and learn about how they deploy engineering simulation software in their organizations. At ANSYS, we are fortunate to work in a field that holds so many exciting uses for engineering simulation. The industry has come a long way since those days when management was skeptical about the value of performing simulations. But are organizations getting a good return on investment, or ROI?
Today, when I ask customers what they see as their current challenges, many of them tell me that they are so reliant on simulations that they are now being asked to do even more with little or no increase in the human resources made available. And as organizations rely even more on engineering simulations, it is not surprising that simulation teams are being asked to show greater return on investment. What I find surprising is that even when organizations are asked to reduce overall expenses, we see an increase in budget for deploying engineering simulation! Continue reading
While the auto engineering industry is undergoing a large breadth of innovation (autonomous vehicles, dashboard apps to help the driver use less fuel and drive more safely), the ambitious goal of 54.5 mpg by 2025 will require car manufacturers to focus on the fundamentals of existing technologies, such as engines, transmissions and aerodynamics.
Surely, 54.5 mpg is entirely achievable, but it is a daunting goal that will require auto makers to drastically ramp up their engineering efforts. And while 2025 seems far away, it will be difficult to finish all the necessary engineering by that time if engineers progress at today’s rate. Accelerating engineering is the burning need of the day — and of the next decade — and it can only be accomplished by taking full advantage of advanced engineering tools such as simulation. Continue reading
Happy Friday, folks! This week’s round up of interesting engineering technology news articles includes a badminton-playing robot that’s increasing energy efficiency of machines, the largest on-demand supercomputing resource in Europe and a Death Star Kickstarter campaign seeking $850 quintillion for construction.